would you vote for me???????

Posted by on . 16 comments.


Ok... I'm curious... would you beautiful people vote for me if I ran for president??
I believe in gun rights(!!!!!), as long as they're registered.
No abortions period.
Gitmo should stay.
'Stimulus' are available for small 'mom n' pop' businesses there truly the backbone of our nation... bailout the semi companies so they can stop paying people 49 cents a mile!
Grants are available to the banks and the fortune 500 companies, it my sound socialist but at least they can't go spending it on 0,000 spa days.
TAXES are a thing of the past! Taxes were only invented to support WWII.
Military/Ex Military should be supported, why are there war vets homeless?!?!
Foreclosed homes should be rented out (for free) to homeless until they can afford a place of their own (there are more foreclosed homes in the USA than there are homeless).
There are tons of gallons of oil on Eagle Mt. in Texas why is the government paying the owner to keep quiet? Why don't we start pumping oil from Alaska also?
Freedom of religion is free! Sep. of church and state should be loose, that law was only invented to keep the state from ordering the church what to teach/preach.
Children... they need education!! Stop stopping homeschoolers and church schoolers, they learn the same as public schoolers, why do they need to have a GED just to go to college? If they can pass the SAT/ACTs then... why?!
That's all I can think of at the moment... I'm making a list of things I stand for... so would you magnificent people vote for me?



~~~~~~~~~
Probies Will Take Over the Earth!
bailouts are only needed when the economy is truly failing... not like right now when the big boys stopped trading back n' forth at the NYSC
anti-woman?! I AM A WOMAN!!!! I think it is worg to have an abortion, why not adoption?! That 'fetus'' heart is beating the moment...... you know what I mean... If the baby's heart is beating it alive that means it's murder!!

Comments

  1. Witchy says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Maybe. It sounds pretty good so far. But how will you pay our politicians and for our military without taxes? Have you considered the Fair Tax proposal?
    http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer

    What position would you be running for? What political experience do you have that has prepared you for that position?

    The rest of my answer is just ideas to give you food for thought.
    Other issues for you to consider are school vouchers, affirmative action, foreign aid, United Nations, NAFTA, the Fairness Doctrine, federal minimum wage, women being required to register with Selective Services just like men, gay marriage, privatizing social security, universal health care, creationism or sex ed taught in schools, "hate crimes", capital punishment, illegal immigration, three strikes laws, nuclear power, making English our official national language for governmental purposes, term limits, farm subsidies, Megan’s Law, legalizing drugs, drinking age, voting age, internet sales tax, euthanasia, welfare reform, and foreign policies.

  2. ATTENTION: Testicles That Is All says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    I would but NO BAILOUTS OR GRANTS TO COMPANIES. Keep government out of the economy.

  3. Old Goat says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Nope. Nothing personal. Have a nice day

  4. dumdum says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    No…I’m sorry.

  5. Mr. So Krates says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Yes.

    Better than all the Obama drones here who feel Obama must do the thinking for them.

  6. ioerr says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Even if I agreed with anything you said, anybody who’d vote for you based on a single rambling paragraph in YA is an idiot.

  7. jamie s says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    No.. Because you make absolutely no sense..
    Without taxes.. You can’t do anything you propose.. Grants?? How are you going to pay for it? Enforce abortion laws? pay for it.. Turn that connie nonsense off.. Taxes are necessary whether you like it or not…

  8. dflocks80 says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    The government shouldn’t prop up the "mom n pop" stores you speak of. If they can’t stand on their own, they need to fall. Such a policy would put an unfair burden on taxpayers.

  9. CaliGirl says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Yep, I would vote for your question to be the Best Question on this exact topic.

  10. AwesomePossum says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    No. I wouldn’t. The reason why is that you want to take away a woman’s choice to have an abortion. I can’t vote for anyone who is anti-woman.

    Edit: You want to take away a WOMANS choice that sounds pretty anti-woman to me. Look you don’t want to have an abortion then good but you shouldn’t take away anyone else’s choice to do so. But you obviously don’t understand this which is another reason i wouldn’t vote for you.

  11. Keith V says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    I would, but only if you destroy the economy and form a socialism style dictatorship.

  12. martinx07 says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    No, you really don’t have a sense of economics, or the consequences of government sticking its nose on bailing out companies, or handling education. Read the Constitution first, see what the document allows/doesn’t allow the President to do.

  13. Jenny Leigh says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    Nope.

    No abortions period? You do realize that even if abortion was made completely illegal there would still be many, many women getting it done in dangerous, even fatal, ways, right? We already tried outlawing abortions, it didn’t work!

    "Taxes were only invented to support WWI"
    …really?

    Religion should have absolutely NOTHING to do with our government. What if the majority or all of our politicians suddenly turned to Scientology, Islam, Satanism, or any other religion that isn’t Christianity? Wouldn’t you be happy for separation of church and state then?

    Also, you might want to work on your grammar skills if you want to run for office.

  14. sagacious_ness says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    No, I would not.

  15. Joseph O says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    It would be a far better deal than we would get if the Republicans where still in office.They should have nominated Rush Limbaugh for president. I remember hearing him tell people on the radio that they did not need to think for them self’s because he would do it for them.Sounds just like the rest of the Republicans , if it don’t benefit them directly it’s no good. If they can come out on top and screw the people at the bottom their all for it.

  16. mykol13 says:
    August 19, 2009 at 1:39 pm

    I’m mostly on your side.

    There is nothing in the Constitution about seperation of Church and State.

    What it means is that the Federal Government cannot establish a Church. (As like the Church of England.)Read it online.

    Leftist have used this to mean you are not able to wear or place religious articles, preach or pray on certain public properties. Not the true meaning of the Constitution. Challenge them.

    Also, read the 2nd Amendment carefully.

    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    ‘the right of the people…shall not be infringed’
    ——————-

    You won’t have millions of NRA votes if you violate the Constitution. I suggest a rethinking of your position on guns.

Leave a Reply